Here is an article addressing referral rewards.
https://www.michigandental.org/Practice-Management/Legal-Services/Columns/ID/283/Questions-about-Giving-Gifts-or-Incentives-for-Referrals#.WgokORNSxsM
1.) Is it OK to give a small gift, such as a prepaid debit card, a Starbucks gift card, a movie theater gift card or some other gift to patients who refer a new patient to me?
2.) Would it be legal to give a raffle ticket to patients who refer a new patient to me? The raffle ticket would then be entered into a drawing for a large-screen TV or some other expensive gift.
3.) Can I give new patients who are referred to me a small gift, such as a gift card or movie tickets?
4.) If these are not OK, what can I do?
Answer: The ideas you describe in these questions might seem like an innovative ways to attract new patients. However, there are ethical rules, federal and state law, and possibly contractual limitations making the implementation of these ideas problematic.
First is the MDA’s ethical rule 4.E., which applies to MDA members. It states: “Dentists shall not accept or tender rebates or split fees.” Notice that the rule is not limited to dentists rebating or splitting fees with other dentists. Rebating or splitting a fee with anyone (including a patient or any other non-dentist referral source) violates the rule.
A rebate is defined as a return of an amount paid. It appears that giving any small gift to either a new patient or an existing patient who has referred a new patient could be considered to be a rebate. Both the new patient and the existing patient would have paid you for services. The gift following that payment (as a reward for a referral or for becoming a new patient) could be considered a return of the amount previously paid for services.
The same is true for the raffle ticket given to the existing patient who made the referral. You could argue that only the patient who received the winning raffle ticket has actually received anything of value. However, even those patients with losing raffle tickets received a chance to win something of value in return for the referral. This, too, could be considered a rebate.
These are close calls and if a complaint was made the issues would be decided by the MDA Peer Review/Ethics system and the MDA member involved would have to follow its decision.
Second, there is state law (applicable to all Michigan dentists) on this subject. (I am going to assume that these incentives are not being used to attract Medicaid or Medicare patients. If they are, you should know there are federal laws that may make these incentives illegal.)
MCL 333.16221 states that it is an unethical business practice for any health care professional to “divide fees” for the referral of patients.
Like the rebate issue discussed above, giving a gift to either a new patient or an existing patient who has referred a new patient following his or her payment of your fees for services could be deemed a division of those fees (and a return of a portion of the fees to the patient). The same could be said for the TV given to the patient with the winning raffle ticket and possibly the losing raffle tickets as well.
There is no precedent or other clear answer to these questions. Upon a complaint the Board of Dentistry would ultimately make the call on whether any of these incentives violate MCL 333.166221.
Finally, you need to carefully check your agreements with insurers and dental plans. Often times these contracts will require you to charge the fee schedule amount to all patients and to charge and make reasonable attempts to collect co-payments and deductibles. Delta Dental’s Uniform Requirements of participation contain these provisions.
Will giving a new patient or an existing patient who has made a referral with such insurance or is enrolled in such a dental plan a small gift or a raffle ticket be deemed by the insurer or dental plan to be a back-door way of reducing the fee you are contractually required to charge? Is there a prohibition in any insurer or dental plan contract prohibiting the payment of referral fees? Insurers and dental plans often include these provisions as well, so that patients choosing dentists within the network do so based only on quality of care.
You must review and understand your contracts, and when in doubt seek clarification. Ultimately, if you wish to remain in the insurer’s or plan’s network you must abide by its interpretation.
As you can see, no unqualified answers can be given to your questions. What can you do? The best practice is to compete for new patients based on the quality of the care you provide, the hours you are open, and other patient-convenience factors. Of course it is perfectly permissible to send a referring patient a “thank you” note for the referral. They may even appreciate such a personal note as much as a gift. And, offering discounts to new patients for the initial treatment they are seeking is not illegal or unethical. Use the opportunity to provide the initial treatment to show the new patients why they should not go anywhere else for their dental care.
But, you still need to check your insurer and dental plan contracts to make sure that offering the discount is not a breach of the agreement. As always, consulting with your attorney to review these contracts is a good idea.
NOTE: This column is the opinion of the author and does not constitute legal advice from the Michigan Dental Association.
Here is another good article:
https://www.michigandental.org/Practice-Management/Legal-Services/Columns/ID/363/Illegal-and-Unethical-Referral-Fees-and-Fee-Splitting#.WgokwBNSxsM
Illegal and Unethical Referral Fees and Fee Splitting
Question: In my community there is a dentist who is paying beauty salon and spa owners a $20 fee for every patient they refer to his office seeking bleaching or other teeth-whitening services. Is this practice either legal or ethical?
Answer: No. This practice is illegal under Michigan law and is also impermissible pursuant to §4.E of the Michigan Dental Association and American Dental Association Combined Codes of Ethics.
Michigan’s Public Health Code (§16221) allows the state of Michigan to investigate activities related to the practice of a health profession by a licensee, such as a dentist. Following its investigation, the state may hold hearings, order testimony and report its findings to an appropriate disciplinary subcommittee, such as the Michigan Board of Dentistry.
There are several grounds listed in §16221 that would require the Board of Dentistry to pursue disciplinary action. These grounds include a dentist’s negligence or negligent supervision; personal disqualifications (such as incompetence, mental or physical inability, conviction of certain crimes, lack of good moral character, etc.); certain prohibited acts, such as committing fraud or deceit in obtaining a license; and certain types of unprofessional conduct and unethical business practices. Included in the list of unethical business practices is the following: "Dividing fees for referral of patients or accepting kick-backs on medical or surgical services, appliances or medications purchased by or in behalf of patients."
Certainly, the paying of a $20 referral fee directly to a beauty salon or spa owner upon the providing of bleaching or other teeth-whitening services to a patient referred by the beauty salon or spa owner would be considered the type of dividing of fees or kick-back contemplated by §16221 of Michigan’s Public Health Code. This conduct, therefore, is illegal.
The possible sanctions include a reprimand, fine (up to $50,000), probation, community service, a denial of future licensure, and/or restitution.
The Combined ADA/MDA Code of Ethics (§4.E.) states that member dentists shall not accept or tender "rebates" or "split fees." It certainly appears that the referral fee arrangement described above would violate this ethical rule. A complaint could be made to the MDA Peer Review/Ethics Committee regarding this arrangement if the dentist paying the referral fees and/or kick-backs is an MDA member. Possible sanctions by the MDA include censure, probation, suspension or expulsion from membership in the association.
Both §16221 of Michigan’s Public Health Code and §4.E. of the ADA/MDA Code of Ethics contain the fee splitting prohibitions based on the same principle. The principle is that all referrals for dental services should be based on the skill and quality of the dentist to whom the patient has been referred. Economic considerations (especially direct payments for referrals of the type mentioned above) of the dentist making the referral should not form the basis for or even be a consideration factoring into the decision of who to refer a patient.
The combined ADA/MDA Code of Ethics is available from the MDA by calling (800) 589-2632, or can be downloaded from the MDA Web site.
NOTE: This column is the opinion of the author and does not constitute legal advice from the Michigan Dental Association.